Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4717 14
Original file (NR4717 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO4717-14 ©
30 October 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3502-13

    Original file (NR3502-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4426 14

    Original file (NR4426 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS an4.& SOURTHOUSF RO SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04426-14 15 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tow Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to H-6/YNi from the February 2013...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4497 14

    Original file (NR4497 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, with this Board requesting, in effect, that record be corrected to show that he was from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement filed enclosure (1) the applicable naval advanced to E-5/FC2 cycle. NRO4497-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in Light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. S. Pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7389 14

    Original file (NR7389 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 764 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Midboe reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14

    Original file (NR3893 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8251 14

    Original file (NR8251 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to &-4/LS3 from the September 2013 Navy -wide advancement examination cycle. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Vogt, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6068 14

    Original file (NR6068 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MA2 £rom the February 2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Mr. Vogt, Mr. Ruskin, and Ms. Bianchi reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that che corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2774 14

    Original file (NR2774 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY aorcAatT WP IAL meomAomc BUARU FOR CORRLY! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/HM3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement cycle vice September 2015 advancement cycle. Docket No.NRO2774-14 CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1177 14

    Original file (NR1177 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had one additional award point that should have been added to the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...